人文社科期刊国际化研究综述

doi:10.11946/cjstp.202011090940

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 人文社科期刊国际化是全球人文思想传播和文化交流的重要方式,随着中国特色哲学社会科学“三大体系”工作的推进,人文社科期刊国际化成为新文科建设理念下一个紧迫的研究课题。【方法】 以CNKI、WoS、Google Scholar为文献来源,结合计量方法获取相关文献,通过文献阅读法,构建“抽象化—具体化—标准化”的研究思路。【结果】 对人文社科期刊国际化的基础研究、特征标准、评价指标“三方内容”进行综述,分析人文社科期刊国际化研究存在的“四个挑战”:发展进程缓慢、意识形态差异、评价体系构建难题、期刊自身制约。【结论】 对未来人文社科期刊研究提出了加强基础研究、解决国际本土之争、深化区域合作、推动数据驱动、创新评价方法的“五大展望”。

关键词: 人文社科期刊, 期刊国际化, 国际化特征, 期刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] Internationalization of humanities and social sciences (HSS) journals is an important way of disseminating ideas and spreading culture all over the world. With the advancement of the construction of subject system, academic system, and discourse system in HSS with Chinese characteristics, the internationalization of HSS journals becomes an urgent task for the construction of New Liberal Arts. [Methods] With the bibliometrics method, related articles were retrieved in CNKI, WoS, and Google Scholar. Through literature reading, the "abstraction→concretization→standardizaiton" research framework was constructed. [Findings] This paper summarized the topic from three aspects: basic research, characteristic standards, and evaluation indicators and then analyzed the challenges in the internationalization of HSS journals: slow progress, ideological differences, construction of evaluation system, and limits of the journals. [Conclusions] We put forward the following suggestions for the internationalization of HSS journals: strengthening basic research, balancing internationalization and localization, boosting regional cooperation, promoting data-driven research, and adopting digital technology for evaluation.

Key words: Journal of humanity and social science, Journal internationalization, Internationalization characteristic, Journal evaluation

刘意, 文庭孝, 武强. 人文社科期刊国际化研究综述[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(5): 601-612.

LIU Yi, WEN Tingxiao, WU Qiang. Review of research on internationalization of humanities and social sciences journals[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2021, 32(5): 601-612.

https://www.cjstp.cn/CN/Y2021/V32/I5/601

图/表 3

参考文献 105

[1]	Hicks D. The four literatures of social science[M]// Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 473-496.
[2]	Sivertsen G. Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,107(2):357-368. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1845-1 URL
[3]	Buela-Casal G, Perakakis P, Taylor M, et al. Measuring internationality:Reflections and perspectives on academic journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2006,67(1):45-65. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0050-z URL
[4]	Buela-Casal G, Zych I. How to measure the internationality of scienpngic publications[J]. Psicothema, 2012,24(3):435-441. pmid: 22748737
[5]	Kulczycki E, Engels T C E, Pölönen J, et al. Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities:Evidence from eight European countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2018,116(1):463-486. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2711-0 URL
[6]	Linton J. Quiet contributors:The role of the arts,humanities and social sciences in innovation[J]. Foresight and STI Governance, 2018,12(3):6-12.
[7]	Flowerdew J, Li Y Y. English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2009,18(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.09.005 URL
[8]	吴玲, 杨宇. 基于PEST分析法的中国人文社会科学学术期刊国际化环境研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2018,29(5):460-466.
[9]	Kwiek M Poland U O P. The internationalization of the academic profession in Europe. A quantitative study of 11 national systems[J]. Educational Studies Moscow, 2015(1):58-87.
[10]	Gingras Y, Mosbah-Natanson S. Where are social sciences produced[M]//World Social Science Report 2010. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2010: 149-153.
[11]	Keim W. The internationalization of social sciences:Distortions,dominations and prospects[M]//World Social Science Report 2010. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2010: 169-170.
[12]	Li M Y, Yang R. Enduring hardships in global knowledge asymmetries:A national scenario of China's English-language academic journals in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Higher Education, 2020,80(2):237-254. doi: 10.1007/s10734-019-00476-3 URL
[13]	Tortosa M, Osca-Lluch J, Alfaro-Ferreres E, et al. International positioning of the Spanish psychology journals[J]. Anales de Psicología, 2019,35(2):332-340. doi: 10.6018/analesps.35.2.332171 URL
[14]	Feng H Y, Beckett G H, Huang D W. From ‘import’ to ‘import—export’ oriented internationalization:The impact of national policy on scholarly publication in China[J]. Language Policy, 2013,12(3):251-272. doi: 10.1007/s10993-013-9285-8 URL
[15]	Kulczycki E, Rozkosz E A, Drabek A. Internationalization of Polish journals in the social sciences and humanities:Transformative role of the research evaluation system[J]. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2019,44(1):9-38. doi: 10.29173/cjs28794 URL
[16]	陈宝胜. 自主性的国际化:超越哲学社会科学的自主性与国际化之争[J]. 中国高教研究, 2020(12):54-60.
[17]	李正风, 曾国屏, 杜祖贻. 试论“学术”国际化的根据、载体及当代特点与趋势[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2002,18(3):32-34.
[18]	Frølich N. Still academic and national:Internationalisation in Norwegian research and higher education[J]. Higher Education, 2006,52(3):405-420. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-3080-1 URL
[19]	Ginde G. Visualisation of massive data from scholarly Article and Journal Database: A novel scheme[EB/OL]. (2016-11-03)[2020-10-09]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01152. URL
[20]	Moed H F, de Moya-Anegon F, Guerrero-Bote V, et al. Are nationally oriented journals indexed in Scopus becoming more international? The effect of publication language and access modality[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2020,14(2):101011. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101011 URL
[21]	许佳. “学术期刊发展创新与国际化”研讨会综述[J]. 东北亚论坛, 2013,22(4):120-121.
[22]	于媛, 金碧辉. 从SCI期刊的定量指标看中国科技期刊的国际化问题:国际化期刊基本特征的分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2003,14(z1):725-731.
[23]	Scopus期刊收录常见问题解答[EB/OL]. [2020-10-09]. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/900985/Scopus2019Jan.pdf, 2019-1-1/2021-02-19. URL
[24]	Guidelines European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH)[EB/OL]. [2020-10-09]. https://www.ubu.es/sites/default/files/portal_page/files/erih_summary_guidelines_sept_07.pdf, 2021-02-19. URL
[25]	Zitt M, Bassecoulard E. Internationalization of scienpngic journals:A measurement based on publication and citation scope[J]. Scientometrics, 1998,41(1/2):255-271. doi: 10.1007/BF02457982 URL
[26]	Zitt M, Bassecoulard E. Internationalization of communication a view on the evolution of scienpngic journals[J]. Scientometrics, 1999,46(3):669-685. doi: 10.1007/BF02459619 URL
[27]	Liu W S. The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication:Evidence from Web of Science's three journal citation indexes[J]. Learned Publishing, 2017,30(2):115-123. doi: 10.1002/leap.2017.30.issue-2 URL
[28]	Bordons M, Gómez I. Towards a single language in science? A Spanish view[J]. Serials:the Journal for the Serials Community, 2004,17(2):189-195. doi: 10.1629/17189 URL
[29]	赵基明. 学术期刊国际化的内涵与保障措施[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2004,30(6):83-87.
[30]	张慕华. “弘扬本土文化”与“建立学术自信”:论人文社科学术期刊国际化的实质与出路[J]. 传播与版权, 2015(11):29-31.
[31]	Torrado Morales S, Giménez Toledo E. British scholarly journals on film studies:Study and evaluation of their internationality[J]. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 2012,44(1):75-90. doi: 10.3138/jsp.44.1.75 URL
[32]	Kirkman B, Law K. International management research in AMJ:Our past,present,and future[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48(3):377-386. doi: 10.5465/amj.2005.17407902 URL
[33]	Rithaporn P, Puangsombat N, Adam A, et al. A Comparative study of high-quality academic journals in southeast Asia[J]. Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2016,3(1):73-87.
[34]	Paasi A. Fennia:Positioning a peripheral but international journal under the condition of ‘academic capitalism’[J]. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 2013: 1-13.
[35]	Mañana-Rodríguez J, Giménez-Toledo E. Coverage of Spanish social sciences and humanities journals by national and international databases[J]. Information research, 2011,16(4):506.
[36]	Omer R A. International scienpngic publication in ISI journals:Chances and obstacles[J]. World Journal of Education, 2015,5(6):81-90.
[37]	About ICDS[EB/OL]. [2020-10-09]. http://miar.ub.edu/about-icds, 2021-02-19. URL
[38]	CIRC. Clasificación CIRC[EB/OL]. [2020-10-09]. https://clasificacioncirc.es/clasificacion-circ, 2021-02-19. URL
[39]	Xu X, Rose H, Oancea A. Incentivising international publications:Institutional policymaking in Chinese higher education[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2019: 1-14.
[40]	Andrei T, Teodorescu D, Mirică A. Beyond the Impact Factor:Measuring the international visibility of Romanian social sciences journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2016,108(1):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1949-7 URL
[41]	Liu F, Hu G Y, Tang L, et al. The penalty of containing more non-English articles[J]. Scientometrics, 2018,114(1):359-366. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2577-6 URL
[42]	Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al. Do Altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services[J]. PLoS ONE, 2013,8(5):e64841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 URL
[43]	Eldakar M A M. Who reads international Egyptian academic articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley readership categories[J]. Scientometrics, 2019,121(1):105-135. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03189-7 URL
[44]	Kortelainen T A M. Studying the international diffusion of a national scienpngic journal[J]. Scientometrics, 2001,51(1):133-146. doi: 10.1023/A:1010568829054 URL
[45]	Leydesdorff L, Park H W, Wagner C. International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index:Is internationalization leading the network?[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014,65(10):2111-2126. doi: 10.1002/asi.23102 URL
[46]	朱大明. 引文国际化:科技期刊国际化特征之一[N]. 科学时报, 2007 -07-13(4).
[47]	龚凯乐, 谢娟, 成颖. 中文期刊论文引文国际化多维分析:以图书情报与档案管理学科为例[J]. 情报科学, 2019,37(3):127-135.
[48]	Gong K L, Xie J, Cheng Y, et al. The citation advantage of foreign language references for Chinese social science papers[J]. Scientometrics, 2019,120(3):1439-1460. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03146-4 URL
[49]	花芳, 冯玉林. 期刊国际化程度的量化指标研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2013,24(6):1104-1108.
[50]	孙颉. 《情报学报》论文被WoS数据库引用情况分析[J]. 情报学报, 2015,34(12):1252-1258.
[51]	唐银辉. 我国学术期刊国际传播效果与发展战略研究:基于TOP10学术期刊的实证分析[J]. 金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2017,31(3):76-80.
[52]	Rowley J, Sbaffi L, Sugden M,et al. Factors influencing researchers' journal selection decisions[J]. Journal of Information Science, 2020: 016555152095859.
[53]	Gaston T E, Ounsworth F, Senders T, et al. Factors affecting journal submission numbers:Impact factor and peer review reputation[J]. Learned Publishing, 2020,33(2):154-162. doi: 10.1002/leap.v33.2 URL
[54]	唐银辉, 顾金亮. 文化距离对我国顶尖英文科技期刊稿源国际化的影响研究:基于中科院最具国际影响力英文科技期刊的实证分析[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2017,28(9):865-871.
[55]	Ma F C, Li Y T, Chen B T. Study of the collaboration in the field of the Chinese humanities and social sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2014,100(2):439-458. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1301-z URL
[56]	Li J, Li Y T. Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China's humanities and social sciences[J]. Scientometrics, 2015,102(3):1997-2010. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1471-8 URL
[57]	Gazni A. Globalization of national journals:Investigating the growth of international authorship[J]. Learned Publishing, 2015,28(3):195-204. doi: 10.1087/20150305 URL
[58]	García-Carpintero E, Granadino B, Plaza L M. The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scienpngic output of the same countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2010,84(3):799-811. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0199-3 URL
[59]	Harzing A W, Metz I. Explaining geographic diversity of editorial boards:The role of conference participation and English-language skills[J]. European Journal of International Management, 2012,6(6):697-715.
[60]	Dhanani A, Jones M J. Editorial boards of accounting journals:Gender diversity and internationalisation[J]. Accounting,Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2017,30(5):1008-1040.
[61]	Zheng Y Y, Gao A X. Chinese humanities and social sciences scholars' language choices in international scholarly publishing:A ten-year survey[J]. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 2016,48(1):1-16. doi: 10.3138/jsp.48.1.1 URL
[62]	Ehara S, Takahashi K. Reasons for rejection of manuscripts submitted to AJR by international authors[J]. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2007,188(2):W113-W116. doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.0448 URL
[63]	Poomkottayil D, Bornstein M M, Sendi P. Lost in translation:The impact of publication language on citation frequency in the scienpngic dental literature[J]. Swiss Medical Weekly, 2011,141:w13148.
[64]	Villar R R. The importance of language[J]. Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery, 2018,5(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny002 URL
[65]	Yu Z L, Ma Z, Wang H Y, et al. Communication value of English-language S&T academic journals in non-native English language countries[J]. Scientometrics, 2020,125(2):1389-1402. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03594-3 URL
[66]	Kulczycki E, Guns R, Pölönen J, et al. Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities:A seven-country European study[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020,71(11):1371-1385. doi: 10.1002/asi.v71.11 URL
[67]	Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Miguel S, Moya-Anegón F. What factors affect the visibility of Argentinean publications in humanities and social sciences in Scopus? Some evidence beyond the geographic realm of research[J]. Scientometrics, 2015,102(1):789-810. doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1414-4 URL
[68]	中国科学技术协会. 中国科技期刊发展蓝皮书(2019)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019.
[69]	López-Cózar E D, Pérez R R. A model for assessing compliance of scienpngic journals with international standards[J]. International Journal of Libraries and Information Services, 1995,45(3/4):145-159.
[70]	Xu J, Wang J Y, Zhou L H, et al. Internationalization of China's English-language academic journals:An overview and three approaches[J]. Learned Publishing, 2019,32(2):113-125. doi: 10.1002/leap.2019.32.issue-2 URL
[71]	Lin S Q, Zhan L J. International publishing partnerships for China's English language journals and financial security[J]. Learned Publishing, 2016,29(3):145-153. doi: 10.1002/leap.2016.29.issue-3 URL
[72]	Zhang Y H, Bao F, Wu J, et al. Reflections on the international impact of Chinese STM journals[J]. Learned Publishing, 2019,32(2):126-136. doi: 10.1002/leap.2019.32.issue-2 URL
[73]	Gross J, Ryan J. Landscapes of research:Perceptions of open access (OA) publishing in the arts and humanities[J]. Publications, 2015,3(2):65-88. doi: 10.3390/publications3020065 URL
[74]	郭君平, 荆林波. 中国人文社科期刊评价的变迁、问题及优化路径[J]. 情报杂志, 2016,35(1):68-73,150.
[75]	Ochsner M, Hug S E, Daniel H D. Research assessment in the humanities:Towards criteria and procedures[M]. Heidelberg: Springer Nature, 2016: 211-218.
[76]	张积玉. 人文社科学术期刊评奖的质量标准与制度完善[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2016,22(6):120-127.
[77]	Uzun A. Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns:The case of major journals in information science,and scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2004,61(3):457-465. doi: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045121.26810.35 URL
[78]	He S Y, Spink A. A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2002,53(11):953-959. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890 URL
[79]	Moed H F. Citation analysis in research evaluation[M]. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media, 2006, 131-132.
[80]	Wu D S, Lu X L, Li J P, et al. Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field[J]. Scientometrics, 2020,124(2):1579-1597. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6 URL
[81]	龚凯乐, 谢娟, 成颖, 等. 期刊论文引文国际化研究:以图书情报与档案管理学科为例[J]. 情报学报, 2018,37(2):151-160.
[82]	Wormell I. Informetric analysis of the international impact of scienpngic journals:How "international" are the international journals?[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1998,54(5):584-605. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007182 URL
[83]	Wu F, Djurovic G. 3I index:A new method to examine the competitiveness of countries' international publication productivity[J]. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2018,23(1):85-102.
[84]	Perakakis P, Taylor M, Buela-Casal G. et al. A neuro-fuzzy system to calculate a journal internationality index[C/OL]. Proceedings of Symposium on Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing, 2005[2020-10-09]. http://astro.ft.uam.es/~mtaylor/CEDI2005.pdf. URL
[85]	Calver M, Bryant K, Wardell-Johnson G. Quanpngying the internationality and multidisciplinarity of authors and journals using ecological statistics[J]. Scientometrics, 2018,115(2):731-748. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2692-z URL
[86]	Pontille D, Torny D. The controversial policies of journal ratings:Evaluating social sciences and humanities[J]. Research Evaluation, 2010,19(5):347-360. doi: 10.3152/095820210X12809191250889 URL
[87]	Pölönen J, Guns R, Kulczycki E, et al. National lists of scholarly publication channels:An overview and recommendations for their construction and maintenance[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(1):50-86.
[88]	Vanclay J K. An evaluation of the Australian Research Council's journal ranking[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011,5(2):265-274. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.12.001 URL
[89]	ERIH. ERIH PLUS criteria[EB/OL]. [2020-10-09]. https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/erihplus/about/criteria_for_inclusion, 2018-02-01/2021-02-19. URL
[90]	Cook H, Hardy A, Andersen H, et al. Journals under threat:A joint response from history of science,technology and medicine editors[J]. Medizinhistorisches Journal, 2009,44(1):1-5. pmid: 19496523
[91]	Aleixandre-Benavent R, Peruginelli G, Filippo D D, et al. International visibilityand impact of national journals. A comparative study of Spanish.International visibilityand impact of national journals. A comparative study of Spanish and Italian legal journals[C/OL] Research Evaluation in the SSH Conference - RESSH, 2019[2020-10-09]. https://ressh2019.webs.upv.es/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ressh_2019_paper_17.pdf. URL
[92]	伍军红, 肖宏, 张艳, 等. 科技期刊国际影响力评价指标研究[J]. 编辑学报, 2015,27(3):214-218.
[93]	俞立平, 袁永仪, 王作功. 学术期刊影响力指数CI改进研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2018,41(11):69-72.
[94]	Salager-Zeyer F. Peripheral scholarly journals:Fromlocality to globality[J]. Ibérica,Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 2015 (30):15-36.
[95]	陆建平. 中国学术出版的国际化进程研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2017,47(5):51-66.
[96]	李存娜, 吕聪聪. 中国英文人文社科期刊的国际化研究[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015,30(4):168-183.
[97]	Xu X. China ‘goes out’ in a centre-periphery world:Incentivizing international publications in the humanities and social sciences[J]. Higher Education, 2020,80(1):157-172. doi: 10.1007/s10734-019-00470-9 URL
[98]	Alatas S F. Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences[J]. Current Sociology, 2003,51(6):599-613. doi: 10.1177/00113921030516003 URL
[99]	Altbach P G. Leadership for world-class universities:Challenges for developing countries[M]// New York: Routledge, 2011: 205-223.
[100]	Chou C P, University N C, Chan C F, et al. Governance and academic culture in higher education:Under the influence of the SSCI syndrome[J]. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2017,6(2):63-75.
[101]	Yang R. Internationalisation,indigenisation and educational research in China[J]. Australian Journal of Education, 2005,49(1):66-88. doi: 10.1177/000494410504900104 URL
[102]	秦开凤. 新时代哲学社会科学学术期刊的功能定位[N]. 光明日报, 2017 -12-14(11).
[103]	刘杨, 孙奕鸣. 中国英文社科学术期刊国际化发展矛盾与破解[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020,31(6):644-650.
[104]	刘杨. 中国社科学术期刊“走出去”现状研究[J]. 出版科学, 2014,22(3):63-69.
[105]	杨思洛. 新时期我国人文社科成果国际影响力评价:问题与趋势[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020,41(3):20-25.

分类	指标方法	研究样本	重要参考文献序号
	作者国别:纯国内、混合型、纯国外	5种信息计量领域期刊	[77]
作者国别模式	外国作者分布广度、合作最频繁国别	JASIST和JDOC两本期刊	[78]
	国家导向指数(INO),后细分为:发文量最多国家作者论文占比(INO-P)、发文最多国家作者对该刊引用占比(INO-C),根据INO-P和INO-C设定阈值判断本国或国际期刊	1996—2017年Scopus收录23000种期刊出版物及引文数据	[20-79]
国际编委模式	单一数字指数A_DI=∑(V_i×B_J×D_IJ),其中V_i为编辑机构的多样性,B_J为编辑国别平衡性,D_IJ为不同国别、地区权重	135种经济学期刊的4832位编辑	[80]
国际引文模式	外文文献引用比p=f/c	CSSCI收录16种LIS期刊的66785篇论文和643281条参考文献	[81]
多指标组合模式	作者、引用和订阅用户的地理分布	7 种SSCI收录的图情类期刊,订阅用户数由出版商提供	[82]
	3I指数:国际参与度、国际影响力、国际领导力	Scopus数据库通信领域240种期刊	[83]
	基于神经模糊系统加权作者、编委等指标来确定一个明确、定量和整体化的期刊国际性指数	临床和健康心理学领域4种心理学期刊	[84]
	基于生态统计学模型:引用者国别丰富性(玛格列夫指数)、引用者国别多样性(香农指数)和引用国别均匀度(H/H_max)	2004—2008年以及2010—2014年两个时间段4种动物学期刊	[85]
融合数理模型	基于作者和论文特征的泰尔指数(Theil Index)	罗马尼亚ISI收录10种社科期刊	[40]
	欧几里得距离:引文相对国际化指数(RIC)、作者相对国际化指数(RIA)	ISI收录海洋生物学期刊	[25]

分类	指标方法	研究样本	重要参考文献序号
	作者国别:纯国内、混合型、纯国外	5种信息计量领域期刊	[77]
作者国别模式	外国作者分布广度、合作最频繁国别	JASIST和JDOC两本期刊	[78]
	国家导向指数(INO),后细分为:发文量最多国家作者论文占比(INO-P)、发文最多国家作者对该刊引用占比(INO-C),根据INO-P和INO-C设定阈值判断本国或国际期刊	1996—2017年Scopus收录23000种期刊出版物及引文数据	[20-79]
国际编委模式	单一数字指数A_DI=∑(V_i×B_J×D_IJ),其中V_i为编辑机构的多样性,B_J为编辑国别平衡性,D_IJ为不同国别、地区权重	135种经济学期刊的4832位编辑	[80]
国际引文模式	外文文献引用比p=f/c	CSSCI收录16种LIS期刊的66785篇论文和643281条参考文献	[81]
多指标组合模式	作者、引用和订阅用户的地理分布	7 种SSCI收录的图情类期刊,订阅用户数由出版商提供	[82]
	3I指数:国际参与度、国际影响力、国际领导力	Scopus数据库通信领域240种期刊	[83]
	基于神经模糊系统加权作者、编委等指标来确定一个明确、定量和整体化的期刊国际性指数	临床和健康心理学领域4种心理学期刊	[84]
	基于生态统计学模型:引用者国别丰富性(玛格列夫指数)、引用者国别多样性(香农指数)和引用国别均匀度(H/H_max)	2004—2008年以及2010—2014年两个时间段4种动物学期刊	[85]
融合数理模型	基于作者和论文特征的泰尔指数(Theil Index)	罗马尼亚ISI收录10种社科期刊	[40]
	欧几里得距离:引文相对国际化指数(RIC)、作者相对国际化指数(RIA)	ISI收录海洋生物学期刊	[25]

项目	指标选取方法	实施情况
挪威模式(丹麦、芬兰都采用类似评估模式)^[87]	专家评议为主,根据期刊质量、影响力、声誉划分为3个级别(0、1、2)	2005年成立,由国家学术出版委员会(The National Board of Scholarly Publishing, NPU)管理,挪威数据研究中心(Norwegian Centre for Research Data, NSD)运营
欧洲科学基金(European Science Foundation, ESF)发起的ERIH[澳大利亚卓越计划(Excellence in Research for Australia, ERA)也采用类似评估指标^[88],因24位哲学家联名反对,最终取消期刊排名]	2006年发布的ERIH指南通过专家评议方式将期刊分为三类(A、B、C类)^[24];但2018年公布的最新评价指标只设定了6项标准,期刊列表也不再区分期刊级别^[89]	2000年左右准备筹建工作,目的在于提高全欧洲人文社会科学领域的全球知名度;2007—2008年首个版本包含了5172种期刊^[87];但因评价体系可靠性、透明度以及执行上的问题,被多国期刊主编联合签署抵制声明^[90];2014年ERIH转移到NSD提供网络查询
西班牙的CIRC	基于期刊被国际或地区数据库收录与分区,划分人文社科期刊国际影响力和知名度,分为5类(A⁺、A、B、C、D)^[38]	CIRC整合了WoS、Scopus、ERIH PLUS和Latindex等多信息源的人文社科期刊,涵盖26015种期刊(截至2021-01-18)
西班牙科学技术基金会(Fundación Espa?ola para la Ciencia y Tecnología, FECYT)发布的西班牙人文社会科学期刊分类指南	在期刊影响力(引用、h指数、分区)和可见性(MIAR-ICDS)^[37]两个维度设置不同权重构建评价指标^[91]	2006年开始实施ARCE项目,目的在于提高西班牙期刊国际化程度并进行质量认定,2016年拟定西班牙人文社科期刊分类指南
中国知网和清华大学图书馆联合发布《中国学术期刊国际引证年报(人文社会科学)》	基于他引频次和他引影响因子双指标归一化向量平权统计模型构建了我国学术期刊国际影响力指标CI^[92]	2012年后,每年发布《中国学术期刊国际引证年报(人文社会科学)》;CI排名前5%的期刊为“中国最具国际影响力学术期刊”,5%~10%的期刊为“中国国际影响力优秀学术期刊”。俞立平等^[93]指出评价指标权重大小不合理、归一化方法导致数据分布偏倚、CI调整系数K确定不严谨、评价结果与现实相差较大等问题

项目	指标选取方法	实施情况
挪威模式(丹麦、芬兰都采用类似评估模式)^[87]	专家评议为主,根据期刊质量、影响力、声誉划分为3个级别(0、1、2)	2005年成立,由国家学术出版委员会(The National Board of Scholarly Publishing, NPU)管理,挪威数据研究中心(Norwegian Centre for Research Data, NSD)运营
欧洲科学基金(European Science Foundation, ESF)发起的ERIH[澳大利亚卓越计划(Excellence in Research for Australia, ERA)也采用类似评估指标^[88],因24位哲学家联名反对,最终取消期刊排名]	2006年发布的ERIH指南通过专家评议方式将期刊分为三类(A、B、C类)^[24];但2018年公布的最新评价指标只设定了6项标准,期刊列表也不再区分期刊级别^[89]	2000年左右准备筹建工作,目的在于提高全欧洲人文社会科学领域的全球知名度;2007—2008年首个版本包含了5172种期刊^[87];但因评价体系可靠性、透明度以及执行上的问题,被多国期刊主编联合签署抵制声明^[90];2014年ERIH转移到NSD提供网络查询
西班牙的CIRC	基于期刊被国际或地区数据库收录与分区,划分人文社科期刊国际影响力和知名度,分为5类(A⁺、A、B、C、D)^[38]	CIRC整合了WoS、Scopus、ERIH PLUS和Latindex等多信息源的人文社科期刊,涵盖26015种期刊(截至2021-01-18)
西班牙科学技术基金会(Fundación Espa?ola para la Ciencia y Tecnología, FECYT)发布的西班牙人文社会科学期刊分类指南	在期刊影响力(引用、h指数、分区)和可见性(MIAR-ICDS)^[37]两个维度设置不同权重构建评价指标^[91]	2006年开始实施ARCE项目,目的在于提高西班牙期刊国际化程度并进行质量认定,2016年拟定西班牙人文社科期刊分类指南
中国知网和清华大学图书馆联合发布《中国学术期刊国际引证年报(人文社会科学)》	基于他引频次和他引影响因子双指标归一化向量平权统计模型构建了我国学术期刊国际影响力指标CI^[92]	2012年后,每年发布《中国学术期刊国际引证年报(人文社会科学)》;CI排名前5%的期刊为“中国最具国际影响力学术期刊”,5%~10%的期刊为“中国国际影响力优秀学术期刊”。俞立平等^[93]指出评价指标权重大小不合理、归一化方法导致数据分布偏倚、CI调整系数K确定不严谨、评价结果与现实相差较大等问题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容