中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 1218-1224. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201909110630

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

预印本平台bioRxiv影响力实证研究及建议

解贺嘉1,2),刘筱敏1,2),景然1)   

  1. 1)中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2)中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-11 修回日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2019-11-15 发布日期:2019-11-15
  • 作者简介:解贺嘉(ORCID:0000-0002-7727-7927),博士研究生,E-mail:xiehejia@mail.las.ac.cn|刘筱敏,研究馆员,硕士生导师|景 然,硕士,助理馆员
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学技术协会项目“国际预印本平台发展现状及其与科技期刊出版关系”(2018KJQK002)

Empirical research on the impact of preprint platform bioRxiv and suggestions

XIE Hejia1,2),LIU Xiaomin1,2),JING Ran1)   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2019-09-11 Revised:2019-10-21 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-15

摘要:

【目的】 通过多维度定量分析、评价bioRxiv的影响力,为预印本平台建设、学术期刊转型发展提供建议。【方法】 以2013年11月至2019年2月bioRxiv预印本为样本,利用Excel、SPSS等统计分析工具,结合文献计量方法,全面分析发文量、使用量、浏览量的变化,以及机构分布、作者分布、出版流向分布、版本更新分布情况。【结果】 bioRxiv发文量呈指数增长,发表率、使用量、浏览量较高。高影响力机构、作者具有相对较高的发文量,但机构分散,作者发文量普遍较低。预印本具有较高的学术质量,倾向于发表在高影响力OA期刊上。该平台的开放评论活跃度较低。【结论】 bioRxiv已具有一定的影响力,呈现繁荣发展的态势,但尚未到达成熟稳定的发展阶段。针对实证研究结果,提出的建议包括联合力量,促进权威机构共同参与预印本平台建设;加强宣传,提高科研人员对预印本平台的认同度;深入变革,发展依托预印本平台的新型学术出版模式;创新探索,建立多渠道的有效开放评论机制。

关键词: 预印本, 影响力, 学术期刊, 学术出版

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper evaluates the impact of bioRxiv through multi-dimensional quantitative analysis and provides suggestions for the construction of preprint platforms and the transformation and development of academic journals. [Methods] Taking the preprints in bioRxiv from November 2013 to February 2019 as samples, we analyzed the change of quantity about documents, usage, pageviews, and distribution of institutions, authors, publication flow, and version update using statistical analysis tools such as Excel and SPSS, combined with bibliometrics methods. [Findings] The number of preprints in bioRxiv has increased exponentially, and the publication rate, usage, and pageviews are high. Highly influential institutions and authors have relatively high publishing volume, but the institutions are scattered and the publishing volume of authors is generally low. Preprints are of high academic quality and tend to be published in high-impact OA journals. The bioRxiv platform has a low level of open comment activity. [Conclusions] The bioRxiv has a certain impact and presents a trend of prosperity. But it has not yet reached a mature and stable development stage. Suggestions include joint efforts to promote the participation of authoritative institutions in the construction of preprint platforms; strengthen publicity and improve the recognition of preprint platforms by scientific researchers; deepen reform and develop a new academic publishing model based on preprint platforms; and explore and establish an effective open comment mechanism with multiple channels.

Key words: Preprint, Impact, Academic journal, Academic publishing