中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 301-306. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201710170874

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊学术编辑绩效考核体系的创新与完善

贺郝钰,侯春梅,迟秀丽,孙力炜   

  1. 中国科学院兰州文献情报中心《地球科学进展》编辑部,甘肃省兰州市天水中路8号 730000
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-17 修回日期:2018-01-23 出版日期:2018-03-25 发布日期:2018-03-15
  • 作者简介:贺郝钰(ORCID:0000-0001-5707-6493),硕士,编辑,E-mail: hehy@llas.ac.cn|侯春梅,硕士,编审|迟秀丽,学士,副编审;孙力炜,硕士,编辑。|孙力炜,硕士,编辑。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院自然科学期刊编辑研究会研究课题“编辑岗位绩效考核机制创新与完善”(YJH2017-1-004);期刊改革发展经费“西北研究院资源环境科技期刊编辑部整合”项目

Innovation and improvement of performance appraisal system for academic editors of scientific journals

HE Haoyu,HOU Chunmei,CHI Xiuli,SUN Liwei   

  1. Editorial Office of Advances in Earth Science, Lanzhou Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 8 Middle Tianshui Road, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2017-10-17 Revised:2018-01-23 Online:2018-03-25 Published:2018-03-15

摘要:

目的 构建合理的科技期刊学术编辑绩效考核体系,有效激发编辑的工作热情和信心。方法 首先,通过文献调研法整理归纳学术编辑的工作重点;其次,使用平衡计分卡的4个维度进行绩效考核指标筛选,并选用SMART法进行指标优选;再次,根据职位分析法和专家评价法,优选出态度维度与能力维度的主要指标;最后,运用层次分析法和权值因子法进行指标权重分配。结果 构建出能够体现学术编辑工作价值的绩效考核体系。结论 学术编辑的绩效考核体系能够为促进科技期刊发展发挥重要作用。

关键词: 学术编辑, 绩效考核, 评价体系

Abstract:

[Purposes] We try to build a reasonable performance appraisal system for academic editors of scientific journals, and standardize the cultivation and assessment mechanism for academic editors to arouse their enthusiasm.[Methods] First of all, through the literature review, we summarized the work focus of academic editors. Then, we used four dimensions of balanced score card to screen the performance indicators, and to optimize the indexes by SMART method. Moreover, the main indicators of the attitude dimension and ability dimension were selected by job analysis and expert evaluation method. Finally, we carried out the index weight distribution by combining analytic hierarchy process and weight value of factors.[Findings] We construct a set of performance appraisal system that can be used to assess the work value of academic editors.[Conclusions] The performance appraisal system of academic editors can play an important role in promoting the development of scientific journals.

Key words: Academic editor, Performance appraisal, Appraisal system