中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 321-325. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201709070757

• 专题:CiteScore • 上一篇    下一篇

CiteScore与影响因子评价对比研究——基于2016年SCI收录的美国眼科学期刊

盛丽娜1,)2)   

  1. 1) 新乡医学院期刊社《眼科新进展》编辑部,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
    2) 河南省科技期刊研究中心,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-07 修回日期:2017-12-22 出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2018-04-15
  • 作者简介:盛丽娜(ORCID:0000-0003-1359-4074),硕士,副编审,E-mail: 379270442@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究一般项目(2018-ZZJH-420);ISTIC-ELSEVIER期刊评价研究中心开放基金

Comparative study of CiteScore and impact factor:Based on American ophthalmology journals indexed in SCI in 2016

SHENG Lina1,)2)   

  1. 1) Editorial Office of Recent Advances in Ophthalmology, Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang 453003, China
    2) Henan Research Center for Scientific Journals, 601 Jinsui Road,Xinxiang 453003, China
  • Received:2017-09-07 Revised:2017-12-22 Online:2018-04-25 Published:2018-04-15

摘要:

目的 分析Scopus数据库新推出的期刊评价指标CiteScore与JCR经典指标影响因子对期刊评价效力的差异。方法 以2016年同时被SCI和Scopus数据库收录的美国眼科学期刊为研究对象,以问卷调查评分结果为标准,对比分析CiteScore与影响因子(IF2)对期刊评价效力的异同。同时计算各期刊3年引证时间窗口影响因子(IF3),及按照CiteScore计算公式获得的3年引证时间窗口影响因子(IF3T),并对上述评价指标进行对比分析。结果 Wilcoxon检验结果显示,CiteScore较IF2、IF3小,但较IF3T大,差异均有统计学意义。CiteScore较IF2、IF3、IF3T更接近于正态分布,离散度更小。Pearson相关性分析结果表明,CiteScore、IF2、IF3、IF3T与问卷调查得分之间均呈显著正相关; 各指标与问卷调查得分的相关系数由大到小分别为CiteScore(0.727)、IF2(0.700)、IF3(0.700)、IF3T(0.565)。结论 CiteScore对美国眼科学期刊的评价效力与IF2、IF3类似。

关键词: CiteScore, 影响因子, 眼科学期刊, 期刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to analyze the difference in the effectiveness of journal evaluation between CiteScore in Scopus database and impact factor in JCR.[Methods] Taking the American ophthalmology journals indexed in both SCI and Scopus databases in 2016 as examples, we compared the similarities and differences between the CiteScore and the impact factors (IF2) on the effectiveness of the journal evaluation using the questionnaire score. At the same time, the impact factor in 3-year citation time window (IF3) and the 3-year citation window impact factor obtained from the CiteScore formula (IF3T) were calculated and compared.[Findings] Wilcoxon test results show that CiteScore is smaller than IF2 and IF3, but larger than IF3T, the differences are statistically significant. CiteScore is closer to the normal distribution than IF2, IF3 and IF3T , and the degree of dispersion is smaller. Pearson correlation analysis shows that there exist significant positive correlations between CiteScore, IF2, IF3, IF3T and questionnaire scores. The correlation coefficients of each index and questionnaire scores from big to small are CiteScore (0.727), IF2(0.700), IF3(0.700), IF3T (0.565), respectively.[Conclusions] For the American ophthalmic journals, the effectiveness of CiteScore is similar to IF2 and IF3.

Key words: CiteScore, Impact factor, Ophthalmology journal, Journal evaluation