中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 190-194. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201612120983

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国科协刊群建设动力机制及发展措施探析

朱 琳, 刘 静, 刘培一, 彭 斌   

  1. 中国科技出版传媒股份有限公司北京中科期刊出版有限公司,北京市东城区东黄城根北街16号 100717
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-12 修回日期:2017-01-11 出版日期:2017-02-15 发布日期:2017-02-15
  • 基金资助:
    中国科协期刊办刊能力研究--《中国科协科技期刊发展报告2016》专题之一。

The dynamic mechanism and development strategy of China Association for Science and Technology journal groups

ZHU Lin, LIU Jing, LIU Peiyi, PENG Bin   

  1. Beijing Zhongke Journal Publishing Co. Ltd., China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.(CSPM), 16 Donghuangchenggen North Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100717, China
  • Received:2016-12-12 Revised:2017-01-11 Online:2017-02-15 Published:2017-02-15

摘要: 【目的】深入了解中国科协刊群现状,为未来刊群建设提供参考。【方法】 全面调查中国科协所属204个全国学会办刊情况及刊群建设现状,分析刊群形成的动力机制及面临的问题,并结合现状提出刊群建设的措施。【结果】 中国科协办刊规模达到10种及以上的23个全国学会共主办或参与主办期刊564种;现有刊群分为专业学会刊群、网络聚合刊群、出版社或期刊社刊群。中国科协刊群建设受到了期刊体制改革的驱动,是刊群内在发展和期刊自身发展的要求,同时也面临出版管理体制制约、数字技术应用落后、持续发展能力欠缺等问题。【结论】 科技期刊可在了解已有刊群建设现状的基础上结合自身特点,选择参与以行政、资本、技术或学科为纽带进行刊群建设的路径。

Abstract: [Purposes]This paper aims to understand the current status of the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST) journal groups, and to provide references and suggestions for the journal groups development in the future. [Methods]A comprehensive survey of the basic situation of journals from 204 national institutes and societies of CAST and the journal groups construction was done in 2016, the dynamic mechanism and the current problems of the journal group formation were investigated. Based on this, the measures for journal groups development were proposed. [Findings]Five hundred and sixty-four journals were sponsored by 23 national institutes and societies, who sponsored 10 or more journals each; there are 3 kinds of journal groups, that is, one journal group being hosted by the same institution, one sharing a network platform or one belonging to the same publishing company. The construction of journal groups of CAST was promoted by the journal management system reformation in China; on the other hand, the journal groups were restricted by the systemic and institutional obstacles, such as the backwards of digital technology and the lack of sustainable development capacity. [Conclusions] Based on understanding the current situation of the journal groups and their own characteristics, journals should choose a proper path to participate in the group construction with the link of administration, capital, digital technology or disciplines.