摘要：

【目的】 探讨混合式评审是否是期刊论文的较为理想的评审方式。【方法】分析《经济研究》杂志近21年论文引用数据的阶段性差异来比较不同评审方式的效果。【结果】 从月平均引用量和前30%高引用文章占总引用比例两个指标来看,混合式评审对于《经济研究》杂志而言优于匿名评审和公开评审。【结论】 需要以实证数据为依据,进一步探讨何种评审方式最有利于学术发展。

关键词: 匿名评审, 公开评审, 混合式评审, 制度经济

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims at analyzing if a mixture of anonymous and open reviewing is the best way for academic journal reviewing. [Methods] The citation data of the top Chinese journal Economic Research Journal for the past 21 years were used to make comparisons. [Findings] The result shows that for the Economic Research Journal,a mixture of anonymous and open reviewing is better than any of the two alone. [Conclusions] Further studies are needed to find out which reviewing method is the ultimate best for academic journals.

Key words: Anonymous Reviewing, Open Reviewing, Mixed Reviewing, Institutional Economics